News, Developments and Practical Advice from Antitrust Leaders

Antitrust Advocate

Home | Antitrust Advocate

<a href="https://antitrustadvocate.bakerhostetlerblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/07/US-Private-Antitrust-Litigation.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1716" src="https://antitrustadvocate.bakerhostetlerblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/07/US-Private-Antitrust-Litigation-212x300.jpg" alt="US Private Antitrust Litigation" width="212" height="300" /></a>BakerHostetler Antitrust Litigation Partners <a href="http://bakerlaw.com/RobertGAbrams">Robert Abrams</a>, <a href="http://bakerlaw.com/GregoryJComminsJr">Gregory Commins</a>, and <a href="http://bakerlaw.com/DanyllWFoix">Danyll Foix</a> authored an article for The Antitrust Review of the Americas 2016, published by Global Competition Review. The article, headlined “United States: Private Antitrust Litigation,” analyzes emerging cases in the wake of North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission. These cases, the authors note, “provide a roadmap for how quasi-government entities can avoid antitrust trouble ― including making sure their actions are consistent with state policy and actively supervised by the state.”

<a href="https://www.bakerlaw.com/files/uploads/Documents/News/Articles/LITIGATION/2015/US%20Private%20Antitrust%20Litigation.pdf">Read the article</a>.

How to Avoid Antitrust Trouble in Wake of North Carolina Dental Ruling on State Action Immunity